Freedom of Information Disclosure Log

On 29 May 2018 & 18 October 2018 PC 1834 used his BWV to record occasions when I attended a police station to make victim statements for ongoing investigations in other forces. I had not encountered Burns before but on both occasions his conduct was intentionally destructive to the purpose of each meeting. I made 2 SAR requests to obtain copies of the recordings. I was told the first time that his BWV unit had failed to record. This was a lie as during the second meetingthe PC admitted that he'd had the recording all along. I added this information to the second SAR request to obtain copies of both. Gwent police initially agreed to provide copies, then refused to provide those copies as Burns withheld permission. ICO supported Gwent's decision to prioritise PC's rights above mine, which means that I have no evidence to reportthe PCto Professional Standards for his aggressive abusive provocative behaviour unprovoked by me. I was not able to complete the statements I attended to make because of his disruptive attitude, comments, questions and actions. Had he behaved appropriately, this situation would not have arisen. The PC's face is not on the footage as he was wearing the BWV unit in operation. On what basis is he permitted to remain unreported for misconduct when the deemed owner of the videos is me, as the person who appears in them? The PChas repeatedly abused his position. His seniors, and ICO, are condoning an abuse of position, which brings Gwent police into disrepute. As Commissioner, this is a matter for your attention.

1. Do you currently have a contract in place with an external provider for the provision of communication support? Communication support is defined as media management, public relations, social media, internal communication, employing engagement and marketing?
2. What date is the contact due to expire/be up for renewal?
3. Who currently holds this contract (if any)?
4. What was the value of the last communication support contract awarded and what was this for?
5. Is there a provision within your office to have ad-hoc communication specialists work with you, for example on a particular project.
6. When, if ever was a communication review carried out by an external body i.e. communication company, consultant etc. A communication review looks at output, structure, expenditure and impact.

Please provide all Performance Indicator reports based onSexual Assault Referral Centre Indicators of Performance in SARCs since the onset of SARCIPs (2017). There should be at least seven documents which have been produced so far collating activity reports from the individual SARCs. SARCs must provide activity reports in line with the SARCs management information stipulated template, Sexual Assault Referral Centres Indicators of Performance (SARCIP) and are reported to youquarterly.

Can you please advise and confirm that

1. The constabulary has to abide by the Common law of the land as opposed to any other laws which are all unlawful and do not protect the rights of the sovereign people.
2. Every sovereign entity has the right to still remain innocent until proven guilty and NO business or entity can override it under any circumstances.
3. During the course of an investigation, the police must speak with all affected parties and or witnesses.
4. During the course of an investigation the constables must review all evidence presented / offered to them before they make a final decision.
5. Please explain the differences between a non ranked officer and a constable.
6. That if somene says they understand to a member of the force, that it means they STAND UNDER a different jurisdiction other than that of common law.
7. Who and how we the sovereign people can make complaints about rogue members of the force, I.e.Telephone .
8. Can we still make those complaints anonymous.
9. Please explain the differences between lawful and legal from the police constabulary's point of view.
10. Are the police force and court system registered businesses.
11. The sovereign folk have to give you consent before you can do anything to them.
12. We the sovereign people can still remain anonymous when reporting crime / anti - social behavior etc
13. The constabulary cannot cherry pick the crimes they want to investigate.
14. The constabulary must listen and not rudely put the phone down on the sovereign people.

1. Does the commissioner's office fund third party hate crime reporting centres?
2. How much money has been put spent on the centres in 2016, 2017 and so far in 2018?
3. How many centres are in the police force area?
4. For 2016, 2017, and so far in 2018 how many hate crime reports came from the centres?

1. Whether the PCC’s office pays any external organisations to advertise vacant roles within the PCC’s office on their website
2. For a list of websites / organisations the PCC’s office uses to advertise vacant roles within the PCC’s office (excel format) and how much each website/organisation received from office in the three most recent financial year.
3. For an email address and contact information for the HR department or relevant department responsible for publishing and promoting vacancies within the PCC’s office. Note: Everything in this FOI relates to the financial years 2015/16 to 2017/18. If the cost limit exceeds that which is allotted, then start from 2017/18 and work backwards.

1. Are Service Users or the general public allowed to audio-visually record meeting and calls with your staff? If so, do they require permission or are they permitted to do so covertly?
2. Do you have any guidance or policy for the public or service users to record calls when they speak to your staff
3. What is your organisations protocol on service users recording calls when they speak to your staff or call centres? Please provide a copy of your policy, procedure and guideline notes on this issue.
4. Do you Inform Users they can record. If the answer is no what is the reason for this please if so do send me a copy.
5. Are service users made aware of their right to record the encounter, if they choose to do so? Is this reflected in you policy document on the matter?
6. Does your organisation have an “Unacceptable Behaviour” policy? If so, please can you provide me with a copy? Regarding court staff the public or the court itself.
7. If such a policy contains points of objectionable behaviour such as telephones calls being recorded by the caller due to them being not necessary or unwanted or needed, and furthermore the staff members may feel threatened or apprehensive, are you aware that denying users the right to record calls goes against the current UK laws.
8. Are your policies and procedures compliant with the public right to audio-visually record encounters with your staff, without their consent? If not, will you provide appropriate training for your staff so they are fully informed of the Public right to record?
9. What is our organisations current charging policy for Freedom of Information requests (FOI) or Subject Access Requests (SAR)? If charges are

Can you please confirm if you currently use or plan to use any of the following software:

1. SAP Business Integrity Screening
2. SAP Access Control
3. SAP Process Control
4. SAP Audit Management
5. Identity Access Management
6. SAP GRC
7. SAP Risk Management
8. SAP Global Trade Services In the event that you currently use any of the aforementioned software:
9. Do you have a support contract with an external provider for SAP Support?
10. If you employ any of the aforementioned software or have a support contract what is the renewal date?
11. Where is your SAP infrastructure located and in what format?
12. When is the contract for third party support of your SAP infrastructure due for renewal?
13. Do you manage SAP Security, SAP Role Authorisations and SAP Role Designs internally or through an external provider?
14. If SAP Security, SAP Role Authorisations and SAP Role Designs is managed through an external provider, what is the renewal date?
15. Which organisational department is responsible for managing overall SAP Security, Role Authorisations and Role Design?
16. When is your next internal and external audit covering SAP roles and access?
17. Where do you advertise any SAP related procurement opportunities?

What estimates or analysis does the OPCC hold relating or referring to the impact of "county lines" drug supply operations in your force area? Please provide copies of any such estimates/ analysis or a summary of the key statistics and findings. Please advise me on what other information your OPCC force holds relating or referring to "county lines" drugs supply operations.

If you have been the subject of a ‘software license review’ or software audit In 2015-2018 by Oracle, SAP, IBM or Microsoft did they use any of: EY (Ernst & Young) KPMG, Deloitte or PriceWaterhouseCoopers to carry out such review or audit and if so which?