Freedom of Information Disclosure Log

Request from Mental Health Innovations (MHI) regarding externally commissioned provision to support individuals who may be anxious, stressed, depressed, suicidal or overwhelmed and who need immediate support

How many members of staff working in the Police and Crime Commissioner's Office have one or more of the words equality, diversity, fairness inclusion, gender, LGBT or race in their job title?

1. How many dogs have been reported stolen in in your force's area in the past three years (2018,2019, 2020)?
   • Please provide a monthly breakdown to the most recent recorded month.
2. How many of the dog theft cases were resolved?
3. If possible, please provide a breakdown of the dog breeds too.

Please can you confirm the person responsible for IT/Information Security. Different organisations have different job titles for this responsibility, I’ve listed below the possible job titles:

Manager or Head for IT, Cyber, Information Security, IT Security, Information Governance

or

CIO (Chief Information Officer)

or

CISO (Chief Information Security Officer)

Please can you provide name, job title, email, direct phone number/mobile number.

‘decision’ to delegate reviews to Sancus.

It is acknowledged, that those complaints made against police that were then not upheld by them, may then be forwarded to the PCC for review. The caveat is that the PCC may only review those complaints that do not fall within the remit of the IOPC.

My question to you is this: where, exactly e.g. Section, paragraph etc. does it state in Schedule 3. Police Reform Act 2002 that the PCC may delegate/outsource their statutory duty to conduct reviews, to third parties?

Please, respond to the following questions that all involve SANCUS SOLUTIONS [SS]– who you outsource your reviews to:

How many reviews have they carried out for you?

How many of those were ‘upheld?’

The circumstances that evolved into the contract i.e. did they approach you first or, did you approach them first?

If, a PCC approached them, was it Dyfed Powys, Gwent or North Wales.

If, it was one of the three aforementioned PCCs, the name, position and PCC that he/she works for.

Telephony System

1. What is your current telephony system?
2. How many users of the telephony system?
3. When is the contract up for renewal?
4. Are you considering or interested in Microsoft Teams Voice (Direct Routing)?
5. The name (separately) and email address of the primary contact for this contract?
6. Current annual spend?

Mobile phone contracts

1. Who is your current mobile phone provider?
2. How many mobile connections?
3. When is the contract up for renewal?
4. How long do you contract for (24 or 36 months)?
5. The name (separately) and email address of the primary contact for this contract?
6. Current annual spend?

Crown Commercial Services frameworks

Do you procure through the Networks Services 2 framework? (RM3808 previously RM1045) If not, how do you procure mobiles and telecommunication services/solutions?

Can you advise how many staff the incumbent P.C.C has to efficiently run the PCC office.

Can you advise how many Police are used in the PCC office?

Can you advise if the PCC office conducts its own FOI requests.

Can you advise if the Police conduct the PCC FOI requests

Could you please provide up to date Names, Job Titles, telephone numbers and email addresses for the following;

Commissioner

Deputy Commissioner

Chief Executive

Chief Finance officer

Commissioning Officer

Head of Governance

Head of Procurement

Head of Data / ICT / Digital

Department Directors / Heads

Or the equivalent job titles in your organisation.

In addition if you have an up to date 2020 senior staff organisation or structure chart could you please forward a copy to me in either Excel or pdf format.

Dear Gwent Police and Crime Commissioner, I write to you under the Freedom of Information act 2000 to request five pieces of evidence:

1. FOUNDATION EVIDENCE for the claim that all genus of cannabis meets the currently accepted criteria for a schedule 1 substance in its raw form.

2. FOUNDATION EVIDENCE for the claim that cannabinoid preparations meet the currently accepted criteria for a schedule 1 substance.

3. FOUNDATION EVIDENCE for the claim that cannabis is a 'controlled' substance in the UK and who is making that claim of control.

4. FOUNDATION EVIDENCE for what is considered misuse of raw cannabis and its various preparations.

5. The Clear Scientific Evidence of physical and mental harm and harm to communities, resultant from the use of cannabis to justify the class B penalty as per the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act.